Analysis of Good Country People by Flannery OConnor

Good Country People by Flannery OConnor (1925–1964) is a story, in part, about the dangers of mistaking platitudes for original insights. The story, first published in 1955, presents three characters whose lives are governed by the platitudes they embrace or reject: Mrs. Hopewell, who speaks almost exclusively in cheerful clichà ©sHulga (Joy), Mrs. Hopewells daughter, who defines herself solely in opposition to her mothers platitudesA Bible salesman, who turns the clichà ©d beliefs of the unsuspecting mother and daughter against them Mrs. Hopewell Early in the story, OConnor demonstrates that Mrs. Hopewells life is governed by upbeat but empty sayings: Nothing is perfect. This was one of Mrs. Hopewells favorite sayings. Another was: that is life! And still another, the most important, was: well, other people have their opinions too. She would make these statements [†¦] as if no one held them but her [†¦] Her statements are so vague and obvious as to be almost meaningless, except, perhaps, to convey an overall philosophy of resignation. That she fails to recognize these as clichà ©s suggest how little time she spends reflecting on her own beliefs. The character of Mrs. Freeman provides an echo chamber for Mrs. Hopewells statements, thereby emphasizing their lack of substance. OConnor writes: When Mrs. Hopewell said to Mrs. Freeman that life was like that, Mrs. Freeman would say, I always said so myself. Nothing had been arrived at by anyone that had not first been arrived at by her. We are told that Mrs. Hopewell liked to tell people certain things about the Freemans — that the daughters are two of the finest girls she knows and that the family is good country people. The truth is that Mrs. Hopewell hired the Freemans because they were the only applicants for the job. The man who served as their reference openly told Mrs. Hopewell that Mrs. Freeman was the nosiest woman ever to walk the earth. But Mrs. Hopewell continues to call them good country people because she wants to believe they are. She almost seems to think that repeating the phrase will make it true. Just as Mrs. Hopewell seems to want to reshape the Freemans in the image of her favorite platitudes, she also seems to want to reshape her daughter. When she looks at Hulga, she thinks, There was nothing wrong with her face that a pleasant expression wouldnt help. She tells Hulga that a smile never hurt anyone and that people who looked on the bright side of things would be beautiful even if they were not, which could be insulting. Mrs. Hopewell views her daughter entirely in terms of clichà ©s, which seems guaranteed to make her daughter reject them. Hulga-Joy Mrs. Hopewells greatest platitude is perhaps her daughters name, Joy. Joy is grumpy, cynical and utterly joyless. To spite her mother, she legally changes her name to Hulga, partly because she thinks it sounds ugly. But just as Mrs. Hopewell continually repeats other sayings, she insists on calling her daughter Joy even after her name is changed, as if saying it will make it true. Hulga cant stand her mothers platitudes. When the Bible salesman is sitting in their parlor, Hulga tells her mother, Get rid of the salt of the earth [†¦] and lets eat. When her mother instead turns down the heat under the vegetables and returns to the parlor to continue singing the virtues of real genuine folks way out in the country, Hulga can be heard groaning from the kitchen. Hulga makes it clear that if it werent for her heart condition, she would be far from these red hills and good country people. She would be in a university lecturing to people who knew what she was talking about. Yet she rejects one clichà © – good country people – in favor of one that sounds superior but is equally trite – people who knew what she was talking about. Hulga likes to imagine herself as being above her mothers platitudes, but she reacts so systematically against her mothers beliefs that her atheism, her Ph.D. in philosophy and her bitter outlook begin to seem as thoughtless and trite as her mothers sayings. The Bible Salesman Both the mother and the daughter are so convinced of the superiority of their perspectives that they dont recognize theyre being duped by the Bible salesman. Good country people is meant to be flattering, but its a condescending phrase. It implies that the speaker, Mrs. Hopewell, somehow has the authority to judge whether someone is good country people or, to use her word, trash. It also implies that the people being labeled this way are somehow simpler and less sophisticated than Mrs. Hopewell. When the Bible salesman arrives, he is a living example of Mrs. Hopewells sayings. He uses a cheerful voice, makes jokes, and has a pleasant laugh. In short, hes everything Mrs. Hopewell advises Hulga to be. When he sees that hes losing her interest, he says, People like you dont like to fool with country people like me! Hes hit her in her weak spot. Its as if hes accused her of not living up to her own cherished platitudes, and she overcompensates with a flood of clichà ©s and an invitation to dinner. Why! she cried, good country people are the salt of the earth! Besides, we all have different ways of doing, it takes all kinds of make the world go round. Thats life! The salesman reads Hulga as easily as he reads Mrs. Hopewell, and he feeds her the clichà ©s she wants to hear, saying that he likes girls that wear glasses and that Im not like these people that a serious thought dont ever enter their heads. Hulga is as condescending toward the salesman as her mother is. She imagines that she can give him a deeper understanding of life because [t]rue genius [†¦] can get an idea across even to an inferior mind. In the barn, when the salesman demands that she tell him she loves him, Hulga feels pity, calling him poor baby and saying, Its just as well you dont understand. But later, faced with the evil of his actions, she falls back on her mothers clichà ©s. Arent you, she asks him, just good country people? She never valued the good part of country people, but like her mother, she assumed the phrase meant simple. He responds with his own clichà ©d tirade. I may sell Bibles but I know which end is up and I wasnt born yesterday and I know where Im going! His certainty mirrors — and therefore calls into question — Mrs. Hopewells and Hulgas.

Kill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee - 1619 Words

An Atticus Finch in today’s society is an uncommon occurrence; the Mayella’s and Bob Ewells are rarities also, hopefully. The rest of society fall somewhere in between; we are the Tom Robinsons, the Scouts, the Jems, the Dills, or even Boo Radley. We as people are observers. We scrutinize people with inimitable qualities, such as Atticus, and attempt to mimic them in order to mold our own characters accordingly; we see people like Bob Ewell and hope we’ll never be like them, discarding those attributes in the process. To Kill A Mockingbird is essentially about human nature; about learning the difference between what is right and wrong, and getting to know an individual before judging them. The synopsis might sound overly simplistic, but†¦show more content†¦For Scout and Jem, entertainment comes from their imaginations and the stories that they make up about the Radley family down the street. Their games are hide and seek and playing on a tire swing. Lif e then was simple and uncomplicated and worlds away from how kids grow up today. However, though childhood is drastically different than it was 80 years ago many of the life lessons and experiences shared by Jem and Scout are still prevalent in children today as the world seems to be conspiring to steal their innocence. When a child asks you something, answer him, for goodness sake. But don t make a production of it. Children are children, but they can spot an evasion quicker than adults, and evasion simply muddles em (Lee,116). Atticus is speaking to his brother Jack about him talking to Scout earlier. Atticus is trying to get the message across that you need to answer a child when they ask a question, without making it seem like a life threatening issue, or trying to get the child off topic from the question. When avoiding a question the child’s thoughts only get cloudier, and their questions begin to haunt them. The quote ties into the theme because it shows how as Jack got older his ability to judge how children thought became clouded, and instead of understanding that he needed to be direct with Scout, he ended up confusing her more. His answer to her questions were more bias to one that an adult would understand, and showed how his own innocence had been

Heart Of Darkness By Conrad Essay Example For Students

Heart Of Darkness By Conrad Essay Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad In Joseph Conrads novel, Heart ofDarkness, the term darkness can be related to a few differentmeanings. Conrad uses this term in various ways to characterize social,political and psychological affairs in order to help the reader get a feel ofhis attitudes towards things, such as colonialism, Africa, and civilization. Thefirst impression of the word darkness in relations to this novelthat I understood was its reference to racism. This, I got from the way Conradwrites about the White people and how they treated the natives (Black), inAfrica. During the colonization of Africa, forced ideals of a race that thoughtof themselves as more superior than those who occupied that land before themexisted. This is demonstrated as Conrad writes about how the Whites completelydominate the Blacks in Africa. A significant passage from the novel illustratingthis point is when Marlow describes, Black shapes crouched, lay. ..Thework was going on.. .this was the place where some of the helpers had withdrawnto die they were nothing earthly now, nothing but black shadows of disease andstarvation, lying confusedly in the greenish gloom (34-35). The nativeswere not helpers, but slaves who were forced to work till physicalexhaustion under the orders of the White colonist. To further support the ideaof racism as seen in this novel, consider the description that Marlow givesabout an incident he encounters, And whiles I had to look after the savagewho was a fireman.. .to look at him was as edifying as seeing a dog in a parodyof breeches and a feather hat, walking on his hind-legs he was useful becausehe had been instructed (63-64). From this, Conrad acknowledges thatalthough the natives take on some White Lai 2 characteristics, they are stillseen as inferior. In that passage, the fireman is seen as a joke. Not as a man,but a dog in breeches. Therefore, no matter how educated or similarin appearance the Blacks become, they are still seen as being beneath theWhites. The natives are not given any personal traits or uniqueness unless theypossess a similarity to the Whites. Even then we see no glimpse of humanity intheir characters through Conrads writing. From racism, the idea of civilizationis brought about in terms of darkness. Conrad uses the contrast oflight and dark with relation to the civilized and the uncivilized. The light ofcourse, represents civilization or the civilized side of the world and the dark,more importantly represents the uncivilized or savage side of the world. Fromthe passages quoted earlier, when Marlow calls the workers black shadowsof disease and starvation (35), Conrad is reinforcing the idea that Blacksand the dark images they project are uncivilized and they are nothing to bewishing for. However, through Conrads reiteration of Marlows experience, therewas an interesting aspect of the slaves seen. The reality is that these Blacksare what created the civilized life for the Whites. The Blacks are being used bythe civilized, in turn making them uncivilized. But, the fact remains that theWhites may be considered the savages for working these Blacks to death. However,as ironic as it may seem, their view was that the natives were there to beconquered. All in all, Conrad writes about civilization versus savagery. Throughthe novel, he implies that the setting of laws and codes that would encouragemen to achieve higher standards is what creates civilization. It prevents menfrom reverting back to their darker tendencies. Civilization, however, must belearned. .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327 , .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327 .postImageUrl , .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327 , .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327:hover , .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327:visited , .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327:active { border:0!important; } .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327:active , .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327 .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u794accadf2e64f351b9d61618ec4c327:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Gender discrimination in nursing Essay London itself, in the book is a symbol of enlightenment, was onceone of the darker places of the earth before the Romans forcedcivilization upon Lai 3 them (18). While society seems to restrain these savagelifestyles, it does not get rid of them. These primitive tendencies will alwaysbe like a black cloth lurking in the background. The possibility of revertingback to savagery is seen in Kurtz. When Marlow meets Kurtz, he finds a man thathas totally thrown off the restraints of civilization and has de-evolved into aprimitive state. Marlow and Kurtz are two opposite examples of the humancondition. Kurtz represents what every man will become if left to his ownnatural desires without a protective civilized environment. Marlow representsthe civilized soul that has not been drawn back into savagery by a dark,alienated jungle. This darkness that Conrad writes about can also mean thewilderness in which the

Nineteen Eighty-four and People free essay sample

Imagine living in a world where politics are everything and all forms of individuality and personal identities are shattered. A world where everybody is stripped of their rights to talk, act, think, or even form their own opinions, simply because they do not agree with the government’s beliefs. These aspects are just a few of the examples of things dictators would have control over in a totalitarianism form of government. Aggressive leaders such as Hitler and Joseph Stalin are examples of such dictators. They used their power for terror and murder, and their motive is simply to maximize their own personal power. George Orwell had witnessed World War II, the fall of Hitler and Stalin’s dictatorships, and the fatal outcomes that have come from these governments. To warn future generations of the harsh effects of totalitarianism governments, he wrote the book Nineteen Eighty-Four. Published in 1946, Nineteen Eighty-Four describes life in a totalitarianism form of government, following the main character, Winston Smith, as he takes risks in discovering how he believes life should truly be. We will write a custom essay sample on Nineteen Eighty-four and People or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Literary critic Irving Howe states, â€Å"Were it possible, in the world of 1984, to show human character in anything resembling genuine freedom it would not be the world of 1984† (62). In Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, the government uses its power to suppress individuality among the people. To begin, the author shows how the government abolishes individuality through the use of mind control. First of all, the creation of Newspeak restricts the individual from saying things that he/she wishes to say. More specifically, the task of the Party’s philologists is to regulate the vocabulary and language of Oceania to ultimately be able to control the actions and behaviors of the people. Literary critic Stephen Ingle argues, â€Å"The more vocabulary contracts, the more the Party will be able to control behavior† (124). Since the Party has complete control over how the people can talk and what they are allowed to say, they ultimately have the power to control how they act. Through Newspeak, thoughtcrime will become impossible due to the fact that there will be no terms in which to express it. Furthermore, the Party asserts its control over the mind through doublethink. To begin, doublethink is an example of a thought process in which one simultaneously holds two contradictory beliefs while accepting both of them. For example, while in the Ministry of Love, O’Brien uses doublethink to make Winston believe that he can float. Winston says, â€Å"If he thinks he floats off the floor and I simultaneously think I see him do it, then it happens† (Orwell 278). O’Brien cannot float, however through the use of doublethink Winston can say that it does happen. Moreover, the Party also uses thoughtcrime to regulate the people’s thoughts, speech, actions, and feelings towards the government. The Thought Police use psychology and surveillance such as hidden telescreens to discover cases of thoughtcrime and misbehavior. For instance, a telescreen hidden behind a picture on the wall in Winston and Julia’s secret hideout is the reason they are caught in their illegal love affair. Winston describes, â€Å"Thoughtcrime does not entail death: Thoughtcrime IS death† (Orwell 27). Winston is saying that death is definite if one thinks badly about the government or disapproves of the government’s actions. Thus, due to telescreens, people are forced to keep an expression of optimism at all times; because any other emotion will be considered treason (Ingle 127). Consequently, individuality among the people is destroyed through mind control. In addition to mind control, Orwell also illustrates how the government strips the people of their personal identities though their control over reality. To begin, the party uses its power over Oceania’s history to eliminate all records of the past in order to create a future entirely dedicated to politics. Winston states, â€Å"History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right. I know, of course, that the past is falsified, but it would never be possible for me to prove it† (Orwell 155). The Party has complete control over the history of Oceania, and they choose to delete any and all traces of the past, such as memories. Additionally, the Party uses their control over memories to minimize individuality in the people of Oceania. More specifically, the Party seeks to control the memory of the people because without memory, they cannot remember the past. They remove all documents and records of the past through their memory holes. It is one’s memories that keep the past existing and that shape their lives (Ingle 123). The Party succeeds in abolishing the past by restricting the memories of the people. Moreover, the government reduces individuality with their perceptions of logic. In Oceania, whatever the Party says is correct is correct. If one does not agree with what the Party says, he/she is considered insane; a flaw in the system. To explain, when Winston is taken to the Ministry of Love, they torture him-physically and emotionally to make him accept the logic of the Party. Powerful party member O’Brien explains to Winston that their logic is correct, regardless of what Winston knows is right. O’Brien implores, â€Å"Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It is not easy to become sane† (Orwell 207). O’Brien is saying that the government has the ability to alter aspects of their lives that Winston knows are the real thing; however he has no choice but to accept them. He is considered â€Å"insane† because he knows what is right and what is wrong and is hesitant to believe that the Party’s logic is true. Noted critic Stephen Ingle implies, â€Å"Winston conjectures that in the end the Party would declare that two plus two made five and the individual would be required to believe it† (122). In the future, there will be no other types of logic other that what the Party deems to be true. Thus, the government uses its power to control all aspects of reality for the people of Oceania. Equally important to mind control and reality, Orwell also shows how the government’s control over the people’s emotions suppresses their individuality. To begin, the Party extinguishes all forms of pure love among the people. More specifically, if two people wish to get married, they must be approved. If they wish to marry out of love and affection, they will be denied. In the eyes of the Party, marriage must be handled like business-only to produce offspring that will be loyal to them. Winston implores, â€Å"But you could not have pure love or pure lust nowadays. No emotion was pure, because everything was mixed up with fear and hatred† (Orwell 105). Every aspect of the people’s lives in Oceania is robotic and systematic, there are no true emotions. Similarly to the Party’s control over love, they also control sex between the people. To explain, the Party believes that there should not be any pleasure from sex; it should only be used in order to reproduce. The people who are faithful to the party transform their sexual energy into political hysteria (Howe 65). All of their energy goes towards the Two Minutes Hate and their hatred for Big Brother in order to bring some form of unity amongst them. Furthermore, the Party also uses emotional torture to abolish individuality. To justify, when Winston is in the Ministry of Love, he endures not only physical torture but psychological torture as well. He says, â€Å"In the end the nagging voices broke him down more completely than the boats and fists of the guards† (Orwell 200). The emotional torture from the questioning Winston undergoes wears him down and makes him into a mouth that simply utters what he believes they want to hear. The questioners transform him into something that is not even human anymore- merely just a robot. Literary expert Stephen Ingle argues that â€Å"the right and capacity to form one’s own judgment on external events†¦a full emotional life, a private world into which one could retire: those were the bastions of identity which Winston Smith sought to defend† (127). Winston is the last individual with knowledge of things outside of what the Party believes to be moral, and eventually he is stripped from that title and made into one of the other brain-washed citizens of Oceania. Consequently, the Party uses emotional torture to suppress individuality among the people. Hence, the government in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four has been proven to use their power to strip the citizens of their individuality. For instance, the Party uses their control to take over the minds of the people and restrict what they can/cannot say or do. Also, they have the power to control all records of the past, memories, and the logic they have placed in their society. If that is not enough, the Party also controls their emotions, regulates sex, and forces emotional torture among them to force their logic into their brains. Orwell is â€Å"trying to present the kind of world in which individuality has become obsolete and personality a crime† (Howe 62). Ultimately, if a society allows a dictatorship in which one person or a group of people have all the power over the citizens, the society will transform into an individualized group of robots.

Circus Maximus essays

Circus Maximus essays The Romans built massive structures for the public use of Roman citizens, and the circuses were only one example of these massive buildings. The circuses, structures designed in a circle or course for chariots, were primarily designed built to house chariot races and other public entertainments (Circus- Roma 1).These were copies of the Greek hippodromes (Laing 1). The Circus Maximus, one of the four tracks built in Rome, was a location where chariot racing, gladiatorial combats, wild animal hunts, athletic events, processions, and Christian massacres took place (Grout 2 ). Tarquinius Priscus, the fifth king of Rome, built this structure in the sixth century BC. This original circus was probably built between the Aventine and Palatine Hills (Grout 1). Later additions and improvements by Julius Caesar and Agrippa made the arena so large that it could seat 150,000 people. The circus was equipped with a spina (barrier) decorated with Egyptian obelisks, columns and seven large wooden eggs and dolphins to marks the laps for the charioteers. As the race proceeded, the one dolphin and one egg would be removed to inform the spectators of the number of laps that had passed in the race (Monuments 1). Seating in the arena was arranged around a dirt track and permanent starting gates were built for the horses. According to Dionysius of Halicarnassus, there were entrances and ascents for the spectators at every shop so that the countless thousands of peoples may enter and depart without inconvenience (Grout 1). People could browse and shop in the tabernae, in habited by cooks, astrologers, and prostitutes(Grout 2). The chariot races in the Circus Maximus were run on seventeen of the seventy-seven public games days allotted in Rome (Grout 2). By a drawing of lots, drivers were given the slot in which to start and had to stay in that area until a point was reached on the course. The chariot, or quadrigae, was pulled by...

To Kill A Mockingbird

In the novel To Kill A Mockingbird, by Harper Lee, Tom Robinson is a minor character. Tom Robinson cares for his family. Tom is a helpful person and he provided for himself. He is innocent and hard working. Tom is an innocent man. He was accused and convicted of raping Mayella Ewell, but the truth was that he never raped Mayella. It was all a cover up for Bob Ewell, Mayellas father, beating Mayella. Tom Robinson is just like a Mockingbird. He minds his own business and is harmless. This is why people were amazed when Tom Robinson was accused of rape, but everyone on the jury was white and prejudice and this is why Tom Robinson was convicted of rape. In this story, Atticus quoted, Its a sin to kill a mockingbird. It was a sin to kill Tom for a crime that he didnt commit. In the end Tom did die. Right before Tom was executed, Scout said, Well, itd be sort of like shootin a mockingbird. Tom Robinson is very courteous. He treats everyone with respect. When he was on the stand during his trial, he addressed everyone with Sir or Mam. Tom likes to do the right thing or does what he thinks is right. He doesnt like to do things that will disappoint others. Tom Robinson is a hardworking man. Since he was a young boy, he was working for Link Deas in the Cotton Gin. When he was a young boy, the Cotton Gin had cut off his left arm, but that did not stop him from working. Tom Robinson kept working with one arm to support his wife and his children. Above all, he helped Mayella when she needed assistance with her everyday jobs. Mayella would ask him to help her bring in large, heavy pails of water from the well in the house for her, chop up wood, and get things that are too high for her to reach and he was always more than happy to help her. In conclusion, Tom Robinson was a kind and polite man and he didnt deserve to die for a crim

Political theories and ideologies Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Political theories and ideologies - Essay Example Political ideology is an ideology whose focus is on the political arena. The political system is a way in which the existing societies make and analyze their decisions about the most important value. Political ideologies have two partial exceptions; two cases in which focuses on the importance of religious beliefs, that is those of liberation and Islam. Political philosophy, political ideology, and political theory all relate in that they focus on the different ways of thinking about all the political ideas. All political philosophies which are every political statement about how the government or the people should behave has a statement on how they behave, which is political theory This paper tackles the ideologies of nationalism, globalism, and feminism; it comprises some comparisons of the three ideologies. For nationalism, it is set of beliefs, which help produce a divergent set of the already existing nationalisms. Nationalism is important today; there are forces, however, that diminish nationalism, and these forces include internationalism, globalization, and religionalism. Nationalism also means the national awareness of oneself as part of a bigger group, identification with a group and patriotism. However contradicting the theory of nationalism is, scholars still view it as an ideology some state that nationalism is the most powerful tool in the political ideologies. They say that it is one of the least expected ideologies but still one of the most important in contemporary international politics. This results from the increased awareness about national identities through pressing for their distinctiveness and rediscovering their national history and making of demands under national self-determination. Nationalism has both the bad and the good aspects, which mean theirs and ours. The good and the bad often reflect the analysis of all the types of nationalism and the impacts associated to it. Traditionalist view nationalism